It
seems that there are several different options out there for editing
video and film. The two dominant ones appear to be Final Cut Pro, and
Adobe Premiere. I am much more familiar and comfortable with the
Adobe suite, and their workflow, so it seemed like Premiere would be
the ideal solution for this project. (My own research revealed that
Premiere was the more professional solution, too, so that is one more
reason that I would want to use it.) However, when using Premiere, it
quickly became clear that the way audio was dealt with in Premiere
caused all sorts of odd issues, especially in terms of timing, etc.
This might have been caused by my computer hardware not being
up-to-snuff; or it may have been that I just didn't know the
work-arounds in solving these audio problems in Premiere. In fact, a
bit of online research showed that many people had similar problems.
In any case, this was reason enough to not use Premiere, and opt for
Final Cut Pro: it just worked.
Another
benefit that I had while working on this film was the fact that
editing can be done on a laptop alone, without an additional mouse.
(Perhaps an external mouse would have been a great help, but I still
don't know because I only work on my laptop with the trackpad.) The
reason I mention this is because this all means that I can do editing
work on the subway train, while commuting to one place or another. In
fact, most of the editing process for this film was conducted while
commuting. To be sure, there are a lot of things that cannot be done
without a mouse (such as animation), and those steps of the
production must be done at home, or at a place where I could set out
a mouse.






